Cases 1 - 10 of 11
United States v. Billy Carter
as 20-3418
Defendant / Appellant:
Billy Carter
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Empire Pipe & Supply Company Inc v. Carter et al
as 2:2017cv01732
Plaintiff:
Empire Pipe & Supply Company Inc
Defendant:
Billy Carter, Trinity Industries LLC and Trinity Industries LLC d/b/a Pipe Inspectors
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Covington et al v. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv01588
Plaintiff:
Annette Covington , Alexis Sledge , Ronda Baum and others
Defendant:
Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson Company and Janssen Research and Development, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carter v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc et al
as 6:2014cv01452
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc , Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc , Takeda California Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Billy Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Butler & Cook, Inc. v. Centerpoint Energy Gas Transmission Company et al
as 2:2012cv02107
Plaintiff:
Butler & Cook, Inc.
Defendant:
Centerpoint Energy Gas Transmission Company and Billy Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Little Soldier v. Weber et al
as 4:2012cv04018
Plaintiff:
Lloyd D. Little Soldier
Defendant:
Douglas Weber, Al Madsen, Tom Annez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00635
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv01054
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Carter v. Coffey et al
as 3:2009cv00037
Plaintiff:
Billy Carter
Defendant:
Sean Coffey and Jay Wilson
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
