Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Johnson et al v. The University of Oklahoma et al
as 5:2024cv00495
Plaintiff:
Brayden Johnson, Logan Rhines and Kayla Savage
Defendant:
The University of Oklahoma, Joseph Harroz, Jr., Jeff Blahnik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Huss v. Woelfel et al
as 2:2024cv00305
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Huss
Defendant:
Deputy Woelfel, Investigator Glasel, John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yablonsky v. Alford et al
as 3:2023cv02235
Plaintiff:
John Henry Yablonsky
Defendant:
Alford, Mondet, Steadman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03138
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
John Yablonsky v. CDCR, et al
as 22-56100
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN HENRY YABLONSKY
Defendant / Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, Entity of the state of California, DANIEL PARAMO, Warden, R.J. Donovan (CDCR), J. ROBLES, R.J. Donovan (CDCR) Librarian and others
BLAHNIK v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv23909
Plaintiff:
DREW ALAN BLAHNIK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Raul Arellano v. R. Blahnik
as 21-56249
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAUL ARELLANO
Defendant / Appellee:
R. BLAHNIK
John Yablonsky v. CDCR, et al
as 21-55879
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN HENRY YABLONSKY
Defendant / Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, DANIEL PARAMO, Warden, R.J. Donovan (CDCR), J. ROBLES, R.J. Donovan (CDCR) Librarian and others
Jay Blahnik Inc. v. WaterRower Inc.
as 1:2021cv00026
Defendant:
WaterRower Inc.
Plaintiff:
JAY BLAHNIK INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Raul Arellano v. R. Blahnik
as 20-55421
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAUL ARELLANO
Defendant / Appellee:
R. BLAHNIK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
