Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Barrow v. VanBuren
as 16-3444
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Vincent Barrow
Defendant - Appellee:
Dr. Lawrence Farago, Psychiatrist
Defendant:
Bryan Hilton, Superintendent of Programs, Michael Hoagan, Deputy Commissioner, Office of Mental Health, Department of Corrections, Anthony Devitto, Executive Director of Special Programing and others
Bob Smith v. William Stephens, Director
as 15-20746
Petitioner - Appellant:
BOB LEWIS SMITH
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Smith v. Stephens
as 4:2015cv03066
Petitioner:
Bob Lewis Smith
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MONTEHERMOSO v. UNKNOWN SUPERINTENDENT et al
as 1:2012cv01332
Plaintiff:
HAIBER V. MONTEHERMOSO
Defendant:
UNKNOWN SUPERINTENDENT, BOB LEWIS, ALVIN W. KELLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brower v. Lewis et al
as 3:2012cv00743
Plaintiff:
Kevin N Brower
Defendant:
Bob Lewis, Lawrence Parsons, Kory Dalrymple and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Barrow v. VanBuren et al
as 9:2012cv01268
Plaintiff:
Vincent Barrow
Defendant:
Diane VanBuren, Brian Fischer, Bryan Hilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MONTEHERMOSO v. KELLER et al
as 1:2012cv00518
Plaintiff:
HAIBER V. MONTEHERMOSO
Defendant:
ALVIN W. KELLER, JR., BOB LEWIS, UNKNOWN SUPERINTENDENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MONTEHERMOSO v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2012cv00302
Plaintiff:
HAIBER MONTEHERMOSO
Defendant:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF PRISONS, PIEDMONT CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garris v. Keller et al
as 5:2012ct03067
Plaintiff:
Christopher Johanne Garris
Defendant:
Alvin Keller and Bob Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hankins v. Lewis
as 5:2011hc02207
Petitioner:
Wade Temple Hankins, Jr.
Respondent:
Bob Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
