Cases 41 - 50 of 169
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00210
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00201
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00184
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00187
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Boggs v. Gilbert, Town of et al
as 2:2023cv02597
Plaintiff:
Brandon Boggs
Defendant:
Gilbert, Town of, Tempe, City of and Mesa, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boggs et al v. City of Cut Bank
as 4:2023cv00034
Plaintiff:
Tra Boggs, Dewayne Johnson and Roberta Corby
Defendant:
City of Cut Bank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cetera Financial Group, Inc. v. Larry G. Boggs et al
as 2:2023cv02461
Plaintiff:
Cetera Financial Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Larry G. Boggs and Christopher L. Boggs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Kay Dana v. Idaho Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-35047
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KAY LYNN DANA, FKA Larry Dana
Defendant / Appellee:
IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOSH TEWALT, BREE DERRICK and others
Fernandez v. Midwest Station II Incorporated et al
as 2:2023cv00116
Plaintiff:
Gerson Lagos Fernandez
Defendant:
Midwest Station II Incorporated, David Boggs and Unknown Boggs
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Feindt v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv00397
Plaintiff:
Patrick Feindt, Jr., Natasha Freeman, Jamie Simic and others
Defendant:
United States of America, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
