Cases 1 - 10 of 70
Harrington v. The Port Manatee County Jail et al
as 8:2025cv01147
Defendant:
Notary Brooke P. Boldin, The Port Manatee County Jail, Deputy Thomas White and others
Plaintiff:
Jesse James Lee Harrington, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
QUILLIN v. MCNEIL et al
as 4:2025cv00141
Defendant:
BRITTNEY MOORE, WALT MCNEIL, RON CAVE and others
Plaintiff:
KRISTOPHER QUILLIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pierce Boldin v. Massmarket AI LLC
as 2:2025cv02009
Plaintiff:
Pierce Boldin
Defendant:
Massmarket AI LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Pierce Boldin v. US Bank National Association et al
as 2:2025cv02062
Plaintiff:
Pierce Boldin
Defendant:
US Bank National Association doing business as US Bank
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
QUILLIN v. MCNEIL et al
as 4:2024cv00405
Plaintiff:
KRISTOPHER T QUILLIN
Defendant:
RON CAVE, WALT MCNEIL and IMANI BOLDIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dontae Williams v. Norfolk City Jail
as 24-6852
Defendant:
DEPUTY JOHNSON, DEPUTY HARRELL, CAPTAIN NIGTITIN and others
Plaintiff:
DONTAE LAMONT WILLIAMS
Arias v. Grubaugh et al
as 1:2024cv04622
Defendant:
Cope, Boldin, K. Krosten and others
Plaintiff:
Abel Arias
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PEW v. KLEMM et al
as 2:2024cv00981
Plaintiff:
ALFONSO PERCY PEW
Defendant:
ULLI KLEMM, THOMAS BOLDIN and VOTE SHEET MEMBER(S) JOHN AND JANE DOE'S
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOLDIN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv00067
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BOLDIN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Harding v. Does
as 4:2023cv00697
Plaintiff:
Jason E Harding
Defendant:
Does "Damien," Ben's Bail Bonds and Mikey Boldin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
