Cases 1 - 10 of 51
USA v. George Lopez
as 26-2385
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
GEORGE LOPEZ, a/k/a Adrian Torres a/k/a Boog
Cooper v. Brittingham et al
as 1:2026cv01969
Defendant:
John Doe #3, Jane Doe #4, John Doe #5 and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Cooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanders v. Elliot et al
as 2:2026cv10831
Plaintiff:
Jason L. Sanders
Defendant:
Elliot, Watson, Wolfgang and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Stewart #796157 v. Boog
as 1:2025cv01483
Plaintiff:
Dequarius Stewart #796157
Defendant:
Unknown Boog
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Boykin (McLean)
as 25-1986
Defendant:
ANTHONY BOYKIN, PAUL ARLINE, JOSEPH MCLEAN and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Pettway
as 25-1917
Defendant:
DEMETRIUS BLACK, TYRONE BROWN, TYRIQ BROWN and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Geadah v. Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2025cv08802
Plaintiff:
Salwa Khoury Geadah
Defendant:
Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, BestEioyo, Booge US and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Machulas v. Boogs
as 4:2025cv00077
Plaintiff:
Leonard P. Machulas
Defendant:
M. Boogs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Miron Quijano v. Bondi
as 25-1917
Defendant:
DEMETRIUS BLACK, TYRONE BROWN, TYRIQ BROWN and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2024cv11959
Plaintiff:
Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, China Seat Cover Automotive Products Co., Ltd, Guangzhou Aililai Trading Co., Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
