Cases 1 - 10 of 78
IN RE: PETITION OF BOOGIES WATERSPORTS INC v. UNKNOWN CLAIMANTS
as 3:2026cv03782
Defendant:
Unknown Claimants
Petitioner:
BOOGIE'S WATERSPORTS INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
United States v. Arron Davis
as 25-2372
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Arron Davis, also known as A-Boogie
Johnson v. Phoenix Police Department et al
as 2:2025cv00815
Plaintiff:
Ammaroo Levelle Johnson, Sr.
Defendant:
Phoenix Police Department, Unknown Party, JPMorgan Chase Bank NA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Andre Willis
as 25-3028
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Andre Alonte Willis, also known as Boogie
United States of America v. Pitt (Pedro Carillo)
as 24-2754
Defendant:
Boogie, JOSUE FRANCO, P and others
:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v. Creative Restaurants, Inc. d/b/a Rum Boogie Cafe et al
as 2:2024cv02514
Defendant:
Creative Restaurants, Inc. d/b/a Rum Boogie Cafe and Belly Martinez-Mendez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Martinez-Mendez v. Creative Restaurants, Inc.
as 2:2024cv02515
Plaintiff:
Belly Martinez-Mendez
Defendant:
Creative Restaurants, Inc. doing business as Rum Boogie Cafe
Unknown:
Temiika Gipson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
United States of America v. Maisonet (Negron Sr.)
as 24-572
Defendant:
GUILLERMO NEGRON, SR., FRANCISCO MAISONET, JOSE MAISONET and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Hicks
as 24-271
Defendant:
MARCEL WORTHY, RODERICK ARRINGTON, LETORRANCE TRAVIS and others
Defendant / Appellant:
AARON HICKS, Boog and Boogy
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Andre Willis
as 23-3219
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Andre Alonte Willis, also known as Boogie
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
