Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Boring v. Trustmark National Bank et al
as 4:2026cv00250
Plaintiff:
Brenda Boring
Defendant:
Trustmark National Bank, Regions Bank, The Estate of Brenda Bargas Flowers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Boring v. Eggleston et al
as 4:2026cv00237
Plaintiff:
Brenda Boring
Defendant:
William Eggleston, Jr. and Dr. Raymond Kimble
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
BORING v. USA
as 1:2026cv01026
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN BORING
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Harper v. Roger D Wilson Detention Facility et al
as 3:2026cv00331
Plaintiff:
Tevin Lamar Harper
Defendant:
Roger D Wilson Detention Facility, Officer Boring, Sheriff Tom Spangler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harper v. County of Knox et al
as 3:2026cv00330
Plaintiff:
Tevin Lamar Harper
Defendant:
County of Knox, Sheriff Tom Spangler, Roger D Wilson Detention Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harper v. Horn et al
as 3:2026cv00326
Plaintiff:
Tevin Lamar Harper
Defendant:
C/O Horn, C/O Ochea, Sheriff Spangler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boring v. Eggleston et al
as 3:2026cv00169
Defendant:
Jason Pierce, Winston Eggleston, William Eggleston, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Brenda Boring
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
BORING v. EUROFINS NSC US, INC.,
as 5:2026cv03694
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY BORING
Defendant:
EUROFINS NSC US, INC.,
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
Boring v. City of Greenwood; Mississippi et al
as 4:2026cv00076
Plaintiff:
Brenda Boring
Defendant:
Officer William Nevels and City of Greenwood; Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Boring v. City of Greenwood, Mississippi et al
as 4:2026cv00075
Plaintiff:
Brenda Boring
Defendant:
City of Greenwood, Mississippi and Officer William Nevels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
