Cases 1 - 10 of 100
BORING v. EUROFINS NSC US, INC.,
as 5:2026cv03694
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY BORING
Defendant:
EUROFINS NSC US, INC.,
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
Boring v. City of Greenwood et al
as 4:2026cv00076
Plaintiff:
Brenda Boring
Defendant:
City of Greenwood and Officer William Nevels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Boring v. City of Greenwood, Mississippi et al
as 4:2026cv00075
Plaintiff:
Brenda Boring
Defendant:
City of Greenwood, Mississippi and Officer William Nevels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ostler-Boring et al v. Google LLC
as 4:2026cv03667
Plaintiff:
Bridgette Ostler-Boring, Israel Sullivan, Joseph Ford and others
Defendant:
Google LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Corbitt v. Judicial Qualifications Commission et al
as 1:2026cv02071
Plaintiff:
Noah F. Corbitt
Defendant:
Judicial Qualifications Commission, Wheeler Correctional Facility and Charles P. Boring
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv02286
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Garcia v. County of San Bernardino, et al.
as 26-2147
Plaintiff:
CELESTE M. GARCIA
Defendant:
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, JOHN W. BRUDICK, MELISSA RODRIGUEZ and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv02043
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00600
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00568
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
