Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Braden v. English et al
as 3:2024cv00194
Defendant:
Curdy, English, Corty and others
Plaintiff:
James M Braden
Not Yet Classified:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Brabbs et al
as 3:2023cv00775
Plaintiff:
Nathan Anderson, Nathan Allan Anderson and Nathan A Anderson
Defendant:
Brabbs and Miami Correctional Facility
Not Classified By Court:
WABASH VALLEY E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv11167
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Tony Mays, Sr. v. Nikita Jewell-Brabbs
as 22-1931
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TONY MAYS, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
NIKITA JEWELL-BRABBS
Strickland et al v. Brabbs et al
as 2:2021cv00076
Plaintiff:
Darrell Strickland and Lisa Strickland
Defendant:
Logan Brabbs, Werner Enterprises, Inc. and John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BRABB v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv91348
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SPENCER BRABB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sharp v. Brabbs et al
as 3:2020cv00301
Defendant:
Broomfield, Johnson and M Brabbs
Plaintiff:
James M Sharp
Not Classified By Court:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRABB v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv03630
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M COMPANY, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SPENCER BRABB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brabb v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2020cv00449
Defendant:
Aearo Technologies LLC and 3M Company
Plaintiff:
Spencer Brabb
Padgett v. Byerly et al
as 6:2016cv00798
Defendant:
Captain Alvis, Sgt. Arnoux, T. Bailey and others
Plaintiff:
Vincent Padgett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
