Cases 1 - 10 of 173
Brack v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00311
Plaintiff:
Victoria Brack
Defendant:
United States of America
Bracke Manufacturing, LLC v. DOES 1 - 10
as 8:2024cv00615
Plaintiff:
Bracke Manufacturing, LLC
Defendant:
DOES 1 - 10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Brack v. College Station, Texas et al
as 4:2024cv00628
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Brack
Defendant:
College Station, Texas, Travis Pritchett and Sgt. Travis Pritchett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brack v. USA
as 1:2024cv00376
Petitioner:
Elgin Brack
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Miller et al v. Brack et al
as 3:2023cv00727
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Miller, Patrick Amos Robichaud and Patricia Ann Robichaud
Defendant:
Cristiana A. Brack, Paul Dorin Trif and Inka Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Dennis Speerly, et al v. General Motors, LLC
as 23-1940
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DENNIS SPEERLY, JOSEPH SIERCHIO, DARRIN DEGRAND and others
Defendant / Appellant:
GENERAL MOTORS, LLC
BRACK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv24637
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER BRACK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BRACK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv07593
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS BRACK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Brack v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01255
Plaintiff:
Donald Brack
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
BRACK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv22927
Plaintiff:
RYAN BRACK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
