Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 88
Campbell v. Monro Muffler Brake, Inc.
as 5:2017cv00345
Plaintiff: James Edward Campbell
Defendant: Monro Muffler Brake, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Hunt v. Monro Muffler Brake, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv01263
Plaintiff: Jeffrey M. Hunt
Defendant: Monro Muffler Brake, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ellersick v. Monro Muffler Brake, Inc.
as 17-1083
Petitioner: John Ellersick, David Ellersick, Lewis C. Youngs, Jr. and others
Respondent: Monro Muffler Brake, Inc. and Monro Service Corporation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2017cv80039
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv03219
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Asbestos Action - Refiled as case no. 1:16cv10000
as 1:2016cv01922
Defendant: Honeywell International, Inc., Riley Power, Inc., Westinghouse Electric Corporation and others
Plaintiff: Larry L. Lenk and Sandra J. Lenk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Lenk et al v. A.W. Chesterton Company et al
as 1:2016cv10000
Plaintiff: Lenk, Larry L. Lenk and Sandra J. Lenk
Defendant: A.W. Chesterton Company, CBS Corporation, Ferro Engineering Division of ON Marine Services Company and others
Cross Defendant: Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Moore v. Monro Muffler Brake Inc.
as 4:2016cv00050
Plaintiff: Robert L. Moore
Defendant: Monro Muffler Brake Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jarmon v. Monro Muffler Brake, Inc.
as 1:2016cv01185
Plaintiff: Tyrone Jarmon, Jr.
Defendant: Monro Muffler Brake, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00428
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?