Cases 41 - 50 of 88
Hohlt et al v. Monro Muffler Brake, Inc.
as 1:2014cv00003
Plaintiff:
Sean Hohlt , Aaron Robinson and Robert Heaney
Defendant:
Monro Muffler Brake, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Hohlt et al v. Monro Muffler Brake, Inc.
as 2:2014cv00098
Plaintiff:
Sean Hohlt , Aaron Robinson , Robert Heaney and others
Defendant:
Monro Muffler Brake, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Turkvan et al v. Monroe Muffler Brake Inc
as 5:2013cv02916
Plaintiff:
Debra K Turkvan and Steven Turkvan
Defendant:
Monroe Muffler Brake Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Perez v. Monro Muffler Brake, Inc.
as 13-3654
Petitioner:
Thomas E. Perez, Secretary of Labor
Respondent:
Monro Muffler Brake, Inc.
John McCall, et al v. Monro Muffler Brake, Inc., et al
as 13-2769
Plaintiff - Appellant:
John McCall and James Ram
Defendant - Appellee:
Monro Muffler Brake, Inc., doing business as Autotire Car Care Center and AM-PAC Tire Dist. Inc., CSC- Lawyers Incorporating Service Company
Benjamin Lara, Jr. et al v. CBS Corporation et al
as 2:2013cv05569
Defendant:
CBS Corporation, Eaton Corporation, First Doe through Two Hundred Seventy-Fifth Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Lara, Jr. and Mary Lara
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00764
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Mahlecke v. Monro Muffler Brake, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00186
Plaintiff:
Andrew Mahlecke
Defendant:
Monro Muffler Brake, Inc. and Monro Service Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
California Sportfishing Protection Alliance v. QBR Brake, Inc.
as 2:2013cv00090
Plaintiff:
California Sportfishing Protection Alliance
Defendant:
QBR Brake, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
Robert Bosch LLC v. ABS Power Brake Inc
as 8:2012mc00048
Defendant:
ABS Power Brake Inc
Plaintiff:
Robert Bosch LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
