Cases 1 - 10 of 60
Sims v. Greene County Detention Center
as 3:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Branden D Sims
Defendant:
Greene County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Brinegar
as 8:2023cv00383
Plaintiff:
Kirk D. Robinson
Defendant:
D. Branden Brinegar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willis v. Officer Richardson et al
as 2:2023cv04100
Plaintiff:
Branden De'Shawn Willis
Defendant:
Officer Richardson, Cpt. Jenny Atwell, Sherriff Dawyne Casey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kimbrough v. Douglas County Corrections et al
as 8:2023cv00049
Plaintiff:
Quintan J. Kimbrough
Defendant:
Douglas County Corrections, Malik Miller, Branden C. Gunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Gibbs et al
as 4:2023cv00012
Plaintiff:
Eric Hall
Defendant:
Randy Gibbs, Chris Tripp, Rebecca Bowker and others
Interested Party:
H. Loraine Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Malloy v. Adams
as 4:2023cv00037
Plaintiff:
Branden Joseph Malloy
Defendant:
Richard Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Branden Malloy v. MO Dept of Corrections, ERDCC, et al
as 23-1032
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Branden Joseph Malloy
Defendant / Appellee:
Missouri Department of Corrections, Eastern Reception Diagnostics and Correctional Center and Corizon
Hoff v. Krabbenhoft et al
as 1:2022cv00209
Plaintiff:
Kevin Michael Hoff
Defendant:
Dave Krabbenhoft, James Sayler, Jordan Keller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kurck v. Kieffer
as 4:2022cv01128
Plaintiff:
Jeremy D Kurck
Defendant:
Branden Kieffer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Labarge v. USA
as 1:2022cv00062
Petitioner:
Branden Maurice Labarge
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
