Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Powers et al v. Google LLC
as 4:2026cv03571
Plaintiff:
Anthony Powers, Alexander Brehm, Alexandra Dancy and others
Defendant:
Google LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Cid et al v. National Coatings, Inc. et al
as 5:2026cv00232
Plaintiff:
Mr. Nathannael Cid, Ms. Jennifer Lee Ennis, Mr. Michael Hunt and others
Defendant:
National Coatings, Inc. and Zebulon Z Hadley, IV
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Hunt v. Black & Decker (U.S.) Inc. et al
as 3:2026cv03020
Plaintiff:
Brandon Hunt
Defendant:
Black & Decker (U.S.) Inc. and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
USA v. Hunt
as 25-11197
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Brandon Hunt, Baylon Hunt, David Hunt and others
Gale et al v. 3M Company, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co. et al
as 2:2025cv12118
Plaintiff:
George Gale, Jr, Barbara Gallegos, Tracey George and others
Defendant:
3M Company, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
HUNT v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2019cv02402
Plaintiff:
BRANDON E HUNT and BRANDON HUNT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hunt, Brandon v. Berryhill, Nancy
as 3:2018cv00577
Plaintiff:
Brandon Hunt
Defendant:
Nancy Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
COTTERMAN v. HUNT et al
as 4:2015cv00569
Plaintiff:
DONALD JAMES COTTERMAN
Defendant:
BRANDON HUNT, LOVE and BARNS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Acker et al v. Coachmen Industries, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv07838
Plaintiff:
Eartha Acker, Eartha Acker, Eartha Acker and others
Defendant:
Coachmen Industries, Inc., Bechtel National Inc., CH2M Hill Construction, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
