Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Hook et al v. 3M Company, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company et al
as 2:2025cv11887
Plaintiff:
Wilfred Hook, Robert Hootman, Katherine Horan and others
Defendant:
3M Company, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv02247
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Konder et al v. Culkin et al
as 1:2021cv00391
Defendant:
Andrew Hamer, James A. Graf, Anand Gopalan and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Jordan and David Kondner
Nominal Defendant:
Velodyne Lidar, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
In Re Velodyne Lidar, Inc. Derivative Litigation
as 1:2021cv00369
Defendant:
Christopher A. Thomas, Andrew Hamer, James A. Graf and others
Nominal Defendant:
Velodyne Lidar, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Peter D'Arcy, David Kondner and Brandon Jordan
Stevens v. Lammens
as 5:2020cv00608
Defendant:
Philip R. Lammens
Plaintiff:
Brandon Jordan Stevens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stevens v. Kuhn
as 3:2020cv01449
Defendant:
B. Kuhn
Plaintiff:
Brandon Jordan Stevens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stevens v. Kuhn
as 5:2020cv00607
Defendant:
B Kuhn
Plaintiff:
Brandon Jordan Stevens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jordan v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv04189
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Brandon Jordan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JORDAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv87550
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BRANDON JORDAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00135
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
