Cases 31 - 40 of 603
Kelley v. Stitt et al
as 5:2023cv00747
Plaintiff:
Phillip Lee Kelley, George Isbill, Rocky Ward and others
Defendant:
Kevin Stitt, Larry Morris, Adam Luck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sunnybrook LP v. City of Alton Illinois et al
as 3:2023cv02805
Plaintiff:
Sunnybrook LP
Defendant:
City of Alton Illinois and Brant T. Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Lance Brant v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv03440
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Lance Brant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Varney v. Sizemore, Inc. DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE. SEE CASE # 5:23-CV-361-D-RJ
as 4:2023cv00107
Plaintiff:
Brant Varney
Defendant:
Sizemore, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Varney v. Sizemore, Inc.
as 5:2023cv00361
Plaintiff:
Brant Varney
Defendant:
Sizemore, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Shuler v. City of Hinesville et al
as 1:2023cv01429
Plaintiff:
Melodie V Shuler
Defendant:
City of Hinesville, Mayor Allen Brown, Assistant Mayor Ruan Arnold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 cv Civil Rights
Brant v. Tresslor et al
as 3:2023cv00179
Plaintiff:
Amber K Brant
Defendant:
Clifford Tresslor, Sgt. Odom, Sgt. Mulvane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CARPENTER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv09530
Plaintiff:
ABRAM BRANT CARPENTER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CARPENTER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv09549
Plaintiff:
ABRAM BRANT CARPENTER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CARPENTER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv09528
Plaintiff:
ABRAM BRANT CARPENTER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
