Cases 1 - 10 of 619
Elijah and Mary Stiny Trusts, et al v. Eli Stiny
as 24-2484
Respondent:
Patricia Alice Stiny Wynne Sorley, Corbyn Martin, Jessica Baker and others
:
Elijah and Mary Stiny Trusts
Petitioner:
G.S. Brant Perkins, as co-trustee of the Elijah G. and Mary Moore Stiny Survivor's Trust and co-trustee of the Elijah G and Mary Moore Stiny Exemption Trust and Chris Beauchamp, personal representative for the Estate of Rena Wood, for Jason Wood, successor to Rena Wood
Griffin et al v. Olson
as 1:2024cv00914
Plaintiff:
Randi Lee Mondello and Brant Jackson Griffin
Defendant:
Erlend Olson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Terry D. Banks, Jr. v. County of Riverside
as 5:2024cv01914
Defendant:
Gary L. Adams, Steven Heavrin, Victoria Weiss and others
Plaintiff:
Terry D. Banks, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hercules Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Cherne
as 2:2024cv05659
Plaintiff:
Hercules Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Defendant:
Brant Cherne
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836 (b) - Civil Action to Protect Trade Secrets
LaMartina v. Madden
as 24-30381
Defendant:
Gerald Sticker, Clay Madden, Benjamin Cato and others
Plaintiff:
Elise LaMartina
Norman Williams, Jr. v. Jamey Luther, et al
as 24-2391
Plaintiff:
NORMAN WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant:
JAMES MAIMONE, Registered Nurse, ANGELA SAYLOR, Registered Nurse, JAMEY LUTHER, Superintendent and others
Daniel v. USA
as 2:2019cv00107
Petitioner:
Brant Q Daniel
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
(HC) Daniel v. USA (2255- 2:19-cr-0107 KJM)
as 2:2024cv01919
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Brant Q Daniel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
United African-Asian Abilities Club et al v. Brant Street Partnership, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv01158
Defendant:
Brant Street Partnership, LLC and Does 1 through 10
Plaintiff:
United African-Asian Abilities Club and James Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
