Cases 21 - 30 of 52
Jordan v. Dart et al
as 1:2017cv08091
Plaintiff:
David Jordan
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Cook County , Brenda Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abdul-Ghafoor, et al v. Professional Transportation, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv01105
Plaintiff:
Yuwsuf Abdul-Ghafoor, Rhoda Kathleen Blair, Linda Cohill and others
Defendant:
Professional Transportation, Inc. and Ronald D. Romain
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Dale Morris v. Mark Nelson, et al
as 16-2615
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DALE LESTER MORRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK NELSON, Judge, YPSILANTI POLICE DEPARTMENT, TOM EBERTS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623
Morris v. Nelson et al
as 2:2016cv11349
Plaintiff:
Dale Morris
Defendant:
Mark Nelson, Ypsilanti Police Department, Tom Eberts and others
Nadine Smith et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv04437
Plaintiff:
Nadine Smith , Carolyn Jones-Hedgepeth , Lita Haman and others
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc , Greenstone LLC , McKesson Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Nadine Smith et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv08138
Plaintiff:
Donna Addy, Carolyn Allen, Carolyn Allen and others
Defendant:
Does, Greenstone LLC, McKesson Corporation and others
Brenda Taylor v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as CAC/2:15-cv-06986
Plaintiff:
Brenda Taylor
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation , DOES 1 through 100, inclusive and Does
Brenda Taylor v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv06986
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation and Does
Plaintiff:
Brenda Taylor
Taylor v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2015cv02403
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Products Inc , DePuy International Limited and others
Plaintiff:
Brenda Taylor
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
