Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv06555
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv06555
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Hills v. Arensdorf
as 21-3118
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WENDY HILLS
Consolidated Plaintiff:
BRENT HILLS
Defendant / Appellee:
GERARD ARENSDORF
Hills v. Arensdorf
as 5:2020cv04074
Defendant:
Gerard Arensdorf and Jerry Arensdorf
Plaintiff:
Brent Hills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Hill v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London
as 4:2020cv01919
Defendant:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London Subscribing to Policy no. BB14970M-6413
Plaintiff:
Brent Hill
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635
Hills v. Hills et al
as 5:2020cv04014
Defendant:
Brent Hills, Carter Hills, William Adams and others
Plaintiff:
Wendy Hills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hill v. United States Automobile Association Life Insurance Company et al
as 2:2020cv00070
Plaintiff:
Brent Hill
Defendant:
United Services Automobile Association Life Insurance and Annuities, Unknown Parties, United States Automobile Association Life Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Anderson et al. v. White et al.
as 4:2019cv00110
Plaintiff:
I A and Victoria Anderson
Defendant:
Brent Hill, Frank Erler, Aaryn Lamb and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Anderson v. White et al
as 3:2019cv00270
Plaintiff:
I A and Victoria Anderson
Defendant:
Brent Hill, Aaryn Lamb, Crystal Stokes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Teteak et al v. The County of Marinette et al
as 1:2018cv00667
Plaintiff:
Estate of David L Teteak , Nancy Teteak and Derick Teteak
Defendant:
The County of Marinette, Jerome T Sauve, James M Hansen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
