Cases 1 - 9 of 9
LOPEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv21385
Plaintiff:
BRIAN LOPEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Brian Lopez v. Brian Andrews, et al
as 23-2286
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRIAN LOPEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN ANDREWS and TOWNSHIP OF CRANFORD
LOPEZ v. ANDREWS et al
as 2:2023cv01131
Plaintiff:
BRIAN LOPEZ
Defendant:
BRIAN ANDREWS and TOWNSHIP OF CRANFORD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Lopez et al
as 7:2021cv07164
Plaintiff:
G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Defendant:
Orlando Brian Lopez doing business as Cositas Ricas Mexican Grill, Cositas Ricas Mexican Grill, Inc. doing business as Cositas Ricas Mexican Grill, Orlando Brian Lopez individually doing business as Cositas Ricas Mexican Grill and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605
LOPEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv25157
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN LOPEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Felicia Cirlos v. AGTI Transport, Inc., et al
as 5:2020cv00964
Plaintiff:
Felicia Cirlos
Defendant:
AGTI Transport, Inc. and Jose Gutierrez
Guardian Ad Litem:
Atty Andrew Poulis and Atty Brian Lopez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
LOPEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv03563
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN LOPEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Aguilar v. Pima County et al
as 4:2015cv00298
Plaintiff:
Brian Lopez Aguilar
Defendant:
Pima, County of, Clarence W Dupnik, Unknown Silvaz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv21556
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
