Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Erwin v. Zmuda, et al
as 24-3022
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER ADAM ERWIN
Defendant:
JEFF ZMUDA, LIBBY KEOGH, DARCIE HOLTHOUS and others
Erwin (ID 123078) v. Zmuda et al
as 5:2023cv03256
Plaintiff:
Christopher Adam Erwin
Defendant:
Jeff Zmuda, Libby Keogh, Darcie Holthous and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erwin (ID 123078) v. Zmuda et al
as 5:2022cv03170
Plaintiff:
Christopher Adam Erwin
Defendant:
Jeff Zmuda, Libby Keogh, Darcie Holthous and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gar Myers v. William Potter et al
as 8:2022cv01410
Plaintiff:
Gar Myers
Defendant:
William Potter, Brian Reeves, Krystal Reeves and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MIKANDA v. SHARP et al
as 1:2022cv02647
Plaintiff:
PHD NEYEMBO MIKANDA and PH.D. NEYEMBO MIKANDA
Defendant:
ANDREW SHARP, ANTHONY D'AMICO, ANTHONY RIVERA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Glenn v. Walker et al
as 1:2021cv01013
Defendant:
Lt. Parram, Capt. Walker, Sgt. Christian and others
Plaintiff:
Ernest J. Glenn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
v. Reeves et al
as 5:2020cv01987
Defendant:
Commune Hotels and Resorts LLC, Brian Reeves, Hyatt Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Reeves v. Hyatt Corporation et al
as 5:2020cv01990
Plaintiff:
Brian Reeves
Defendant:
Commune Hotels and Resorts LLC, Hyatt Corporation and Joie de Vivre Hospitality LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Reeves v. Hyatt Corporation et al
as 5:2020cv01992
Plaintiff:
Brian Reeves
Defendant:
Hyatt Corporation and Joie de Vivre Hospitality LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reeves v. Hyatt Corporation et al
as 5:2020cv01991
Plaintiff:
Brian Reeves
Defendant:
Commune Hotels and Resorts LLC, Hyatt Corporation and Joie de Vivre Hospitality LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
