Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Gil v. Bridgestone Americas, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00184
Plaintiff:
David Gil
Defendant:
Bridgestone Americas, Inc. and Bridgestone Retail Operations, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Martin et al v. Bridgestone Retail Operations LLC
as 2:2021cv01666
Plaintiff:
Richard Martin and Nancy Martin
Defendant:
Bridgestone Retail Operations LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Duran v. Bridgestone Retail Operations, LLC
as 4:2021cv03125
Plaintiff:
Mario Duran
Defendant:
Bridgestone Retail Operations, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
DIPUMA v. BRIDGESTONE AMERICAS, INC. et al
as 3:2021cv01001
Defendant:
BRIDGESTONE AMERICAS, INC. and BRIDGESTONE RETAIL OPERATIONS, LLC
Plaintiff:
RAY DIPUMA
LEE v. BRIDGESTONE AMERICAS, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv01427
Defendant:
BRIDGESTONE AMERICAS, INC. and BRIDGESTONE RETAIL OPERATIONS, LLC
Plaintiff:
MARK LEE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Cervantes v. Bridgestone Retails Operations LLC et al
as 1:2020cv02164
Defendant:
NA NA NA Bridgestone Americas Inc., NA, NA NA NA Bridgestone Retails Operations LLC, NA, Bridgestone Americas, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Mr. Daniel Cervantes
Sidney Cameron v. Bridgestone Retail Operations, LLC.
as 3:2020cv00047
Plaintiff:
Sidney Cameron
Defendant:
Bridgestone Retail Operations, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
BERRY et al v. BRIDGESTONE RETAIL OPERATIONS LLC
as 5:2018cv00400
Plaintiff:
KEITH BERRY and TOM WADE
Defendant:
BRIDGESTONE RETAIL OPERATIONS, LLC and BRIDGESTONE RETAIL OPERATIONS LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
SHEHAB v. BRIDGESTONE RETAIL OPERATIONS, LLC
as 1:2017cv01529
Defendant:
BRIDGESTONE RETAIL OPERATIONS, LLC
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA SHEHAB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Shehab v. Bridgestone Retail Operations, LLC
as 2:2017cv01529
Defendant:
Bridgestone Retail Operations, LLC
Plaintiff:
Joshua Shehab
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
