Cases 31 - 40 of 385
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03260
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Tony McKenna v. Bristol VA Police Officer Erickson
as 23-1573
Plaintiff / Appellee:
TONY MCKENNA
Defendant / Appellant:
BRISTOL VA POLICE OFFICER ERICKSON, BRISTOL VA POLICE OFFICER GREEN and BRISTOL VA POLICE OFFICER CHARLES THOMAS, JR.
Defendant:
BRISTOL VA CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, CITY OF BRISTOL and ASST. COMMONWEALTH'S ATTORNEY FOR THE CITY OF BRIS TIMOTHY BOYER
RECESKI v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 2:2023cv00883
Plaintiff:
JANELLE RECESKI
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY and CELGENE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Civil Rights: Other
Darby v. Ekwerekwu et al
as 0:2023cv60961
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Darby
Defendant:
Chukwueme Ekwerekwu, Jeffrey M. Kunzel, Robert D. Bacon Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Samuel Orlando v. Donald Smith
as 23-1526
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAMUEL JOSEPH ORLANDO
Defendant / Appellee:
SHERIFF DONALD L. SMITH, in his individual capacity, MAJOR BRIAN JENKINS, in his individual capacity, BRISTOL NEAL and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04222
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00684
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00672
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv10578
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv10578
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
