Prison Condition Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 23
James Lee Ballard v. John Lyon Broling, et al
as 22-12651
Plaintiff / Appellant: JAMES LEE BALLARD
Defendant / Appellee: JOHN LYON BROLING, Assistant Regional Counselor, CANDACE KAYE BROWER, Regional Counselor and DAVID KREIDER, Alachua County Judge
BALLARD v. BROLING et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00104
Plaintiff: JAMES LEE BALLARD
Defendant: JOHN LYON BROLING, CANDACE KAYE BROWER and DAVID KREIDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MAXWELL v. HIGGINS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2020cv00463
Defendant: JEFFERY E LEWIS, CANDICE K BROWER and BRIAN A HIGGINS
Plaintiff: DANIEL K MAXWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brower v. King
as 5:2018ct03159
Plaintiff: Charles Alvin Brower
Defendant: Sargent King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brower v. Smith
as 5:2018ct03160
Plaintiff: Charles Alvin Brower
Defendant: James Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darryl Jones v. Douglas, et al
as 18-11611
Plaintiff - Appellant: DARRYL LIONEL JONES
Defendant - Appellee: DOUGLAS, Mental Health Counselor, KNOWLINGER, MH Dr. Individual and Official Capacity, FRISON, MH Counselor and others
Brower v. Irwin
as 5:2017ct03174
Plaintiff: Charles Alvin Brower
Defendant: Robert Irwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oyenik v. Corizon Health Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv00556
Plaintiff: Ronald Edward Oyenik
Defendant: Corizon Health Incorporated and Ryan Brower
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Womack v. Baird et al
as 2:2016cv04579
Plaintiff: John Doneld Womack
Defendant: Trenise Baird, Angelina Schlefelbein, Ryan Brower and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sutton v. Bentley et al
as 5:2016cv01812
Plaintiff: Ronald Sutton
Defendant: Robert Bentley, Luther Strange, Jefferson Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?