Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Rochester v. U.S. Marshals et al
as 6:2022cv01421
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Defendant:
U.S. Marshals, Beth Drake, Bryan Harwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
COUNCIL v. GARLAND et al
as 2:2021cv00302
Plaintiff:
BRANDON MICHAEL COUNCIL
Defendant:
MERRICK GARLAND, JEFF SESSIONS, R. BRYAN HARWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
George Cleveland, III v. Robert Harwell
as 19-1102
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GEORGE CLEVELAND, III
Defendant / Appellee:
R. BRYAN HARWELL, in his individual capacity as Federal Judge for the District of South Carolina
Cleveland v. Harwell
as 8:2018cv01593
Plaintiff:
George Cleveland, III
Defendant:
Robert Bryan Harwell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
CLEVELAND v. HARWELL
as 1:2018cv00294
Plaintiff:
GEORGE CLEVELAND, III
Defendant:
ROBERT BRYAN HARWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawrence Crawford v. Robert Hood
as 17-7410
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAWRENCE CRAWFORD
Defendant - Appellee:
JUDGE ROBERT E. HOOD, TARA DAWN SHURLING, P.A., JUDGE ALBERT DIAZ and others
Yahya Muqit v. The Judges Who Issue Order
as 17-7134
Plaintiff - Appellant:
YAHYA MUQIT, a/k/a Yahya Muquit and LAWRENCE CRAWFORD
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY COOK
Defendant - Appellee:
THE JUDGES WHO ISSUE ORDER IN CASE 16-1953, PATRICIA S. CONNOR, JUDGE RALPH ANDERSON and others
Anthony Cook v. The Judges Who Issue Order
as 17-7137
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY COOK
Defendant - Appellee:
THE JUDGES WHO ISSUE ORDER IN CASE 16-1953, PATRICIA S. CONNOR, JUDGE RALPH ANDERSON and others
Lawrence Crawford v. The Judges Who Issue Order
as 17-7139
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAWRENCE CRAWFORD
Defendant - Appellee:
THE JUDGES WHO ISSUE ORDER IN CASE 16-1953, PATRICIA S. CONNOR, JUDGE RALPH ANDERSON and others
David Duren v. Judge Robert Hood
as 17-6693
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID DUREN
Defendant - Appellee:
JUDGE ROBERT E. HOOD, TARA DAWN SHURLING, ALBERT DIAZ and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
