Cases 1 - 10 of 54
Reid v. Dobbs
as 1:2023cv00032
Plaintiff:
Lesford Mark Reid
Defendant:
Bryan K Dobbs, Unknown Bartlett, Unknown Rhodes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reid v. Dobbs
as 9:2023cv00013
Plaintiff:
Lesford Mark Reid
Defendant:
Bryan K Dobbs, Unknown Bartlett, Unknown Rhodes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Prigmore v. FCI Beaumont
as 23-40002
Plaintiff / Appellant:
William Prigmore
Defendant / Appellee:
FCI Beaumont Staff, Bryan K. Dobbs, Multiple Unknown Agents of the BOP and others
Prigmore v. FCI Beaumont Staff
as 1:2022cv00418
Plaintiff:
William Prigmore
Defendant:
FCI Beaumont Staff, Bryan K. Dobbs, Multiple Unknown Agents of the BOP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Mario Garcia-Balderas v. Bryan Dobbs
as 22-7095
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARIO ALBERTO GARCIA-BALDERAS
Respondent / Appellee:
BRYAN K. DOBBS, Warden
Prigmore v. FCI Beaumont Staff
as 5:2022cv00331
Plaintiff:
William Prigmore
Defendant:
FCI Beaumont Staff, Warden Bryan K. Dobbs, Multiple Unknown Agents of the BOP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Lavares Watkins v. Bryan K. Dobbs
as 22-5632
Petitioner / Appellant:
LAVARES DETROEN WATKINS
Respondent / Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER GOMEZ, Warden and BRYAN K. DOBBS, Warden
Anthony Andrews v. Bryan Dobbs
as 22-6018
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANTHONY ANDREWS
Respondent / Appellee:
BRYAN K. DOBBS, Warden FCI Williamsburg
Jerrell Roberts v. Bryan Dobbs
as 21-7651
Petitioner / Appellant:
JERRELL ANTONIO ROBERTS
Respondent / Appellee:
BRYAN K. DOBBS
Le'Andre Earl v. Stephen Hoey
as 21-7559
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LE'ANDRE EARL
Defendant / Appellee:
STEPHEN HOEY, DO, Doctor
Defendant:
CELIA HANSEN, HSA/RN, WARDEN B. H. ROMERO, F.C.I. Talladega and WARDEN BRYAN K. DOBBS, F.C.I. Williamsburg
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
