Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Huffman v. Foland et al
as 5:2026cv04084
Plaintiff:
Donna Huffman
Defendant:
W. James Foland, Waters Wolf Bub Hansman LLC, QBE Americas, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00270
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Inama v. Idaho State Board of Education, et al.
as 1:2026cv00064
Plaintiff:
Sarah Inama
Defendant:
Idaho State Board of Education, Idaho State Department of Education, Attorney General Raul R. Labrador and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Brown v. Powers et al
as 2:2026cv00005
Plaintiff:
Monel S. Brown
Defendant:
Jeremy D. Powers, Golden Eagle Distributing Company, Anheuser-Busch Companies, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
United States of America v. Ogman
as 25-3082
Defendant:
KENNETH STURDIVANT, DERRICK BROCK, LAMONT REED and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Niu v. THE DEFENDANT IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE A
as 1:2025cv11167
Plaintiff:
Haoran Niu
Defendant:
THE DEFENDANT IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE A, BreezyLive, Bub Tail and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2025cv01846
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
BUB v. PITTSBURGH REGIONAL TRANSIT
as 2:2025cv01067
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BUB
Defendant:
PITTSBURGH REGIONAL TRANSIT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Civil Rights: Other
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 25-2332
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00624
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
