Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Bumpass v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2022cv00188
Petitioner:
Kenneth Ray Bumpass
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bumpass v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2022cv00189
Petitioner:
Kenneth Ray Bumpass
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
U.S. Bank National Association d/b/a U.S. Bank Equipment Finance v. H.Y.P.E. Productions INC. et al
as 1:2021cv05073
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank National Association d/b/a U.S. Bank Equipment Finance and U.S. Bank National Association doing business as U.S. Bank Equipment Finance
Defendant:
H.Y.P.E. Production INC., Trisha A Bumpass, H.Y.P.E. Productions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BATCHELOR et al v. ROLSTON et al
as 4:2021cv00232
Defendant:
PAUL ROLSTON, NAKAMOTO GROUP, INC. and NAKAMOTO GROUP INC
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER CASTRO, QRUINTRELL COOK, CONNIE BATCHELOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BUMPASS et al v. BIRKHEAD et al
as 1:2021cv00394
Defendant:
JIMMY D. BUTLER, TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA, SHERIFF CLARENCE F. BIRKHEAD and others
Plaintiff:
HERMENA MILES BUMPASS and JERRY JEROME BUMPASS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BUMPASS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv83704
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN DAVID BUMPASS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shawn Bumpass v. Jesse Howard
as 20-1165
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHAWN OTIS BUMPASS
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES WETZEL, DAVID FREY and JESSE HOWARD
Bumpass v. Howard et al
as 5:2019cv00305
Plaintiff:
Shawn Otis Bumpass
Defendant:
Jesse Howard, James Wetzel and David Frey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BUMPASS v. USA
as 1:2019cv00493
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
SHAQUILA MONTEZ BUMPASS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
