Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 122
Richard Golden, et al v. Jang Lim
as 16-1313
Plaintiff / Appellee: RICHARD GOLDEN and BEAK & BUMPER, LLC
Defendant / Appellant: JANG H. LIM, dba Dental USA, Inc.
Henry Bumpers v. Daniel Calhoun, Jr.
as 16-6317
Plaintiff - Appellant: HENRY LEWELL BUMPERS
Defendant - Appellee: DR. DANIEL CALHOUN, JR., M.D.
Golden et al v. Lim We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv02440
Plaintiff: Richard Golden and Beak & Bumper, LLC
Defendant: Jang H. Lim
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Bumpers v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv00059
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Travis Bumpers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jui Li Enterprise Company, Lim v. Lynn Adelman
as 16-1044
Petitioner: JUI LI ENTERPRISE COMPANY, LIMITED
Appellee: LYNN ADELMAN
Party-in-Interest: ROBERTS WHOLESALE BODY PARTS, INCORPORATED, FOND DU LAC BUMPER EXCHANGE, INCORPORATED, FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Bumpers v. CC Chicago d/b/a Community Care Center
as 1:2015cv07319
Plaintiff: Jeffro Bumpers
Defendant: CC Chicago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bumper Man Inc v. Smit We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv02434
Plaintiff: Bumper Man Inc
Defendant: Roy Smit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bumper Man Inc v. Patrick et al
as 3:2015cv02281
Plaintiff: Bumper Man Inc
Defendant: J Tracy Patrick and KDD Enterprises Inc
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635
Type: Contract Franchise
Joyce Ann Bumper v. Carolyn W. Colvin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv04955
Plaintiff: Joyce Ann Bumper
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Bumpers v. FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv12282
Plaintiff: Wilhelmina Bumpers
Defendant: FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC., Fresenius USA , Inc, Fresenius USA Manufacturing , Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?