Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 358
Burch v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2024cv05286
Plaintiff: Anthony David Burch
Defendant: Pierce County, NaphCare, Byrer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Guy v. Burch
as 1:2024cv00115
Petitioner: Vernon Guy
Respondent: Paul Burch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Samperi v. Nagi et al
as 1:2024cv00190
Plaintiff: Mark Anthony Samperi
Defendant: Kendra Nagi, Connor Burch, Strodtbeck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WASHINGTON v. WATKINS et al
as 3:2024cv00149
Plaintiff: MARLO WASHINGTON
Defendant: WATKINS, T FRAZURE, J BURCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rosser-Burch v. Holzapfel
as 5:2024cv00131
Petitioner: Teyon Rosser-Burch
Respondent: W. Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
SIMMONS v. DIXON et al
as 4:2024cv00114
Plaintiff: MATTHEW TYRONE SIMMONS
Defendant: RICKY D DIXON, GARY HEWETT and D BURCH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keith v. Texas Tech Medical - Clements Unit et al
as 2:2024cv00010
Plaintiff: Corey Keith
Defendant: Texas Tech Medical - Clements Unit, TDCJ and P.A. Burch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keith v. Texas Tech Medical - Clements Unit et al
as 4:2024cv00124
Plaintiff: Corey Keith
Defendant: Texas Tech Medical - Clements Unit, TDCJ and P.A. Burch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MADISON v. BERRY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2024cv00014
Plaintiff: TERRELL MADISON
Defendant: WARDEN WALTER BERRY, MR CLARK, MR GARDENER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stanback v. Evans et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00451
Plaintiff: James Stanback
Defendant: Officer Evans and Paul Burch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?