Cases 11 - 20 of 358
DANIELS v. ARROYO et al
as 4:2023cv00476
Plaintiff:
DARRYL C DANIELS
Defendant:
CHRISTINE L ARROYO, MS HEMLINGER, MRS MCCALPIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randle v. Contra Costa Cnty. Super. Ct.
as 3:2023cv05799
Plaintiff:
Jason Thomas and Ramello D. Randle
Defendant:
Contra Costa County Superior Court of Martinez, Judge Horimoto, Judge Tharesa Canepa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stanback v. Evans et al
as 1:2023cv00451
Plaintiff:
James Stanback
Defendant:
Officer Evans and Paul Burch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burch v. State of North Carolina
as 3:2023cv00780
Petitioner:
Carlos Demarcuis Burch
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Myers v. Burch
as 1:2023cv00365
Plaintiff:
Scott Myers
Defendant:
Paul Burch, Ms. Jackson, Sam Houston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CITO v. JONES et al
as 3:2023cv24179
Plaintiff:
VITO PAUL CITO, III
Defendant:
JONES, P BOOKER, JOINER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SIMMONS v. DIXON et al
as 4:2023cv00384
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW TYRONE SIMMONS
Defendant:
RICKY D DIXON, GARY HEWETT and D BURCH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burch v. Randall et al
as 3:2023cv01219
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Lucas Burch
Defendant:
Mr. Randall and Ms. Carrion
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ringold v. Burch et al
as 1:2023cv00313
Plaintiff:
Marcus S. Ringold
Defendant:
Paul Burch, Sam Houston, Pat Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith #233282 v. Dawdy et al
as 1:2023cv00575
Plaintiff:
Christopher Carson Smith #233282
Defendant:
David Dawdy, Heidi Washington, Greg Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
