Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Moon v. USP Beaumont et al
as 1:2023cv00371
Plaintiff:
Mr. Collin Moon and Collin Moon
Defendant:
USP Beaumont, Federal Bureau of Prisons and United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-50130
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00231
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00701
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Nevers v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 2:2021cv01064
Defendant:
Olugbenga Akanji, Ms. Parker, Ms. Matthews and others
Plaintiff:
Shawanda Nevers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Weggman v. Barr et al
as 2:2020cv01126
Defendant:
Volunteers of America Residential Re-Entry Center, William Barr, Michael Carvajal and others
Plaintiff:
Charles H. Weggman, III and Charles H Wegmann, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2283
The Estate of James Willie Bass et al v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2020cv00100
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Dante Bass, Vivian Bass, GTT and others
Defendant:
William Barr, Federal Bureau of Prisons and T J Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marvin v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2020cv00168
Defendant:
Jane Doe, United States Bureau of Prisons, Kathleen Hawk Sawyer and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Marvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brister v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2019cv00088
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and FCI Texarkana
Plaintiff:
Jo Brister
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754
Brister v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2018cv00967
Defendant:
FMC Fort Worth and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Plaintiff:
Jo Brister
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
