Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Phillips v. Treadwell et al
as 1:2023cv01912
Plaintiff:
Reginald Troy Phillips
Defendant:
Mark T. Treadwell, Leslie Abrams Garddner, Clay D. Land and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rhonda Reid v. Tynasha Evans, et al
as 23-10290
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RHONDA REID
Defendant / Appellee:
TYNASHA EVANS, SHARON STEMBRIDGE, TAMEKA CHAPMAN and others
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
REID v. LAND et al
as 3:2022cv00053
Plaintiff:
RHONDA REID
Defendant:
JUDGE CLAY D LAND, GREENE COUNTY, STATE OF GEORGIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ASHLEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv65523
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER C ASHLEY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2020cv00066
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Daniel Cobble v. U.S. District Middle Georgia, et al
as 20-10032
Defendant / Appellee:
C. ASHLEY ROYAL, Judge, U.S. GOVERNMENT and U.S. DISTRICT MIDDLE GEORGIA
Petitioner / Appellant:
DANIEL ERIC COBBLE
Daniel Cobble v. U.S. District Middle Georgia, et al
as 19-14743
Defendant / Appellee:
C. ASHLEY ROYAL, Judge, U.S. GOVERNMENT and U.S. DISTRICT MIDDLE GEORGIA
Petitioner / Appellant:
DANIEL ERIC COBBLE
Cobble v. U.S. District Middle Georgia et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2019cv00890
Defendant:
Georgia Judge C., U.S. District Middle, Ashley Royal and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Eric Cobble
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nyce v. Jones et al.
as 2:2019cv00013
Defendant:
Paul M. De Marco, NC Plaza, LLC, Eric G. Parker and others
Plaintiff:
Kinsley F Nyce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
YORK v. MACON COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 5:2018cv00460
Plaintiff:
MALACHI Z YORK
Defendant:
JUDGE C ASHLEY ROYAL, SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT, MACON COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
