Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04520
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Britt et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 8:2019cv00490
Plaintiff:
Elisabeth A. Britt and John C. Britt
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Johnson & Johnson Consumer, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452 R&R re motions to remand (non-core)
Claude Britt v. Nancy Berryhill
as 17-2896
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLAUDE C. BRITT
Defendant - Appellee:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Deputy Commissioner for Operations, Social Security Administration
Turner v. Dimon et al
as 4:2016cv00609
Plaintiff:
Vernon Lamont Turner
Defendant:
Jamie Dimon, Marianne Lake, William Scudder and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Britt v. Colvin
as 1:2015cv10320
Plaintiff:
Claude C. Britt
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Britt v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv28975
Plaintiff:
Melissa C. Britt
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Britt et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv09943
Plaintiff:
Kay C. Britt and Charles Britt
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
TURBERG v. SUNOCO, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv03831
Plaintiff:
ELEANOR TURBERG
Defendant:
SUNOCO, INC., IRENE C. BRITT, CHRIS C. CASCIATO and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
BRITT et al v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv67157
Plaintiff:
DANIEL L. BRITT and NORMA C. BRITT
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION , THE CELOTEX CORPORATION , EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
James Harden v. Strittmatter, et al
as 10-11242
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES G. HARDEN
Defendant - Appellee:
STRITTMATTER, Sergeant, HEWETT, Officer, C. BRITT, Officer and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
