Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Pugh et al v. Palm Haven Towers Condominium, Inc.
as 0:2022cv60824
Plaintiff:
Heath C Pugh, Amanda G Pugh, Heath Carlton Pugh and others
Defendant:
Palm Haven Towers Condominium Inc and Palm Haven Towers Condominium, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Fair Housing Act
DEJERINETT v. WHITE et al
as 3:2022cv00798
Plaintiff:
DAVID DEJERINETT
Defendant:
J WHITE, M LOWE, C PUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALKER v. MOSS et al
as 5:2020cv00204
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER CHRISTOPHER HELMS, Lieutenant BRANDON MOSS and CORRECTIONAL OFFICER C. PUGH
Plaintiff:
KENNETH WALKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pugh v. Sterlin et al
as 6:2020cv02701
Defendant:
Jerry Adger, Brian Sterlin and Terry Wallace
Plaintiff:
Adam C Pugh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2020cv00237
Plaintiff:
Douglas Marshall Jackson
Defendant:
C. Pugh, R. Schmidt, M. Sumner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2020cv01205
Plaintiff:
Douglas Marshall Jackson
Defendant:
C. Pugh, R. Schmidt, M. Sumner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PUGH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv25376
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID C PUGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lewis v. Pugh et al
as 1:2019cv01948
Defendant:
Asamaryam Zhuravitsky, Paul Batchler, Jerome Leisher and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01882
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
MENGESHA v. STOKES et al
as 3:2016cv00446
Plaintiff:
KIDANE B MENGESHA
Defendant:
MARCUS J STOKES , C PUGH , WEST and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
