Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Woods v. Corr et al
as 2:2020cv01118
Defendant:
Jacob D Corr and Hanna Ritchie Kolberg
Plaintiff:
Lawrence C Woods, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Willis v. Scott et al
as 4:2019cv04049
Defendant:
Marie Nieman, Ebony Berry, Gregg Scott and others
Plaintiff:
Maceo G Willis, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MacKintosh v. Scott et al
as 4:2018cv04039
Plaintiff:
Curtis J MacKintosh
Defendant:
Greg Scott, Ebony Berry, L. Simkus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vargas v. McNally et al
as 1:2017cv00501
Plaintiff:
Ulises Vargas
Defendant:
P. McNally, D. Lakis, P. Borys and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods et al v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2016cv01671
Plaintiff:
Dazarine Woods and Melvin C Woods, Jr.
Defendant:
City Of Chicago , Phyllis Gill , Darius West and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv05181
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
WOOD v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2014cv00029
Defendant:
C.I.F./CORRECTIONAL INDUSTRIAL FACILITY, CHAUNCEY COLE, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN C. WOOD
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. IAB MARKETING ASSOCIATES, LP et al
as 1:2012mc00101
Defendant:
FAV MARKETING, INC., JUDY M. HAMILTON, ROY D. HAMILTON and others
Plaintiff:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Receiver:
CHARLENE KOONCE
Federal Trade Commission v. IAB Marketing Associates, LP et al
as 1:2012cv08244
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Defendant:
IAB Marketing Associates, LP , Independent Association of Businesses , Healthcorp International, Inc. and others
Receiver:
Charlene C. Koonce
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv03872
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
