Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Johnson v. Connell
as 22-566
Petitioner:
Robert W. Johnson
Respondent:
Stephanie A. Connell, C. Gibbs, Radar Model Stalker Dual and others
Johnson v. Gibbs
as 2:2022cv00043
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
C. Gibbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Connell et al
as 3:2022cv00207
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Stephanie A. Connell, C. Gibbs, Radar Model Stalker Dual and others
Gibbs et al v. Department of Social Health Services
as 3:2022cv05005
Plaintiff:
Jamie C Gibbs, Anthony Eugene Lewis and Remington Dono LeBoe
Defendant:
Department of Social Health Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Gibbs v. People of the Court
as 2:2021cv01050
Defendant:
The People of the Court and People of the Court
Plaintiff:
Keith C. Gibbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Gibbs v. People of the Court
as 1:2021cv01005
Defendant:
People of the Court
Plaintiff:
Keith C. Gibbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Byrd v. Myers et al
as 2:2021cv00124
Defendant:
C. Gibbs, Ms. S. Littlejohn, Mr. C. Green and others
Plaintiff:
Alphonso Byrd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JS et al v. County Of Nassau et al
as 2:2019cv05165
Defendant:
County Of Nassau, Damien Suarez, Brandon Chambers and others
Cross Defendant:
Patrick J. Ryder, John Plackis and Nassau County Police Department
Plaintiff:
Linda Snyder, J.S., JS and others
Cross Claimant:
N. Scott Banks and John And Jane Doe # 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Michael Besoyan v. Jimmy Yee, et al
as 19-16598
Defendant / Appellee:
CULP, RUSSO, C. GIBBS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL J. BESOYAN and MICHAEL JONATHON BESOYAN I
Gibbs v. USA et al
as 2:2018cv00539
Defendant:
Department of the Treasury, Amber M. Smith, Internal Revenue Service and others
Plaintiff:
William C. Gibbs
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 6330
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
