Cases 1 - 10 of 60
Higgins v. Horton
as 8:2023cv02068
Plaintiff:
NATHAN HIGGINS
Defendant:
ERNEST C. HORTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Brittany Hyre Anculle, et al v. USA
as 22-5494
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRITTANY N. HYRE ANCULLE, JAMES H. BARNES, LISA M. BATES and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
(SS) Jones v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2022cv00909
Plaintiff:
Wade Robert C Horton Jones
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Timothy Wise v. C. Maruka
as 21-6816
Defendant / Appellee:
D. RICH, Associate Warden, C. CAROTHERS, Physician Assistant, K. THOMPSON, Health Services Administrator and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIMOTHY S. WISE
HORTON v. VILLAGE SCOOTERS AND POWERSPORTS et al
as 1:2021cv00616
Defendant:
PATRICK PEMBERTON, VILLAGE SCOOTERS AND POWERSPORTS, RAMONDA PEMERTON and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD C. HORTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Horton v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2021cv00435
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Roger C. Horton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02397
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Issac Harris v. C. Horton, et al
as 20-1532
Defendant / Appellee:
J. MILLER, Acting Deputy Warden, D. LALONDE, RUM, R. BATHO, Acting Deputy Warden and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ISSAC DECRAIS HARRIS and ISSAC DECRAIS HARRIS, aka Isaac DeCurtis Harris, aka Isaac Decrais Harris
Horton v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2019cv00804
Plaintiff:
Lawrence C. Horton
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Horton v. Covington Police Department
as 1:2019cv05025
Plaintiff:
Brianna C. Horton
Defendant:
Covington Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
