Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01485
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Mathews v. State of South Dakota, County of Codington, Third Judicial Circuit Court
as 1:2026cv01023
Respondent:
State of South Dakota, County of Codington, Third Judicial Circuit Court
Petitioner:
Jacques Bruce Victor Mathews
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LEWIS v. LOUISIANA et al
as 1:2026cv04593
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT WESLEY MATTHEWS, Lilly Evans, CHEIF OF POLICE Chad Gremillion and others
Plaintiff:
JIM O LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gumbs, Jr. v. Blanche
as 26-3121
Respondent:
TODD BLANCHE, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner:
EARL JACQUE MOHUNDA GUMBS, JR.
Jacques-Simon v. Venzer
as 1:2026cv27727
Defendant:
Judge Ellen Sue Venzer
Plaintiff:
Philome Jacques-Simon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Picozzi v. Nash, et al.
as 26-7230
Defendant:
RENAN SAINTPREUX, MICHAEL VAL, RODOLFO VALLE and others
Plaintiff:
MARK PICOZZI
FROMETA et al v. WEBSTER, II
as 1:2026cv27553
Plaintiff:
ADRIAN FROMETA, JOHN STEVE HOLGUIN and MIRNESA HASANOVIC
Defendant:
JACQUES B WEBSTER, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00918
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv03524
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv13360
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
