Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv08421
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00997
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Collier v. Carrol et al
as 1:2022cv00162
Plaintiff: Randall Collier
Defendant: James M. Carrol, Michael Garner, New Hampshire Judicial Conduct Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
May et al v. Azar We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv00885
Defendant: Stephanie Azar
Plaintiff: Isaac W. May and Jean C. May
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Orshowitz v. Dappen et al
as 2:2014cv14197
Plaintiff: Lisa Ann Orshowitz
Defendant: Donald Dappen, TROY W MORRIS, chadwick e wagner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2014cv01403
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Doe et al v. May et al
as 2:2013cv14312
Plaintiff: Jane Doe and John Doe
Defendant: Paul C May , Marshall Warren Muros and Okeechobee County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Dawn Willis v. Okeechobee County, et al
as 13-12268
Plaintiff - Appellant: DAWN MORRIS WILLIS
Defendant - Appellee: OKEECHOBEE COUNTY, OKEECHOBEE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, TOMMIE JOE BROCK and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00527
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
May v. City of Richmond We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv03461
Plaintiff: Judith C. May
Defendant: City of Richmond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Type: Civil Rights None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?