Cases 1 - 10 of 58
Steve Riddick v. C. Mullens
as 23-6636
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVE RIDDICK
Defendant / Appellee:
C/O C. MULLENS, UNIT MANAGER LARRY COLLINS, SGT. B. BARNETTE and others
Gomez v. Polis
as 1:2022cv02663
Plaintiff:
Justin Brian Gomez
Defendant:
Jared Polis, State of Colorado Judicial Department, Randall Arp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Riddick v. Mullens et al
as 7:2022cv00291
Plaintiff:
Steve Riddick
Defendant:
C/O C. Mullens, Unit Manager Larry Collins, Sgt. B. Barnette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTINO v. COUNTY OF SALEM et al
as 1:2022cv00516
Plaintiff:
RICHARD MARTINO
Defendant:
SSALEM COUNTY, WARDEN JOHN CUZZUPE, SERGEANT DEVAULT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Haggins v. Mullen et al
as 3:2021cv00340
Plaintiff:
Mary Haggins
Defendant:
Graham Mullen, Tim Underwood, Kelvin Parsley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mullen v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2020cv00335
Interested Party:
SSA
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Sara C. Mullen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Riddick v. Kiser et al
as 7:2020cv00096
Defendant:
S. Fletcher, B. Phillips, M. Cantrell and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Riddick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andreoli v. Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00954
Defendant:
Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC, Credico (USA) LLC and William C. Mullen, III
Plaintiff:
Angelina Andreoli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Biggins v. Phelps et al
as 1:2018cv01574
Defendant:
Tim Martin, Sergeant Jones, Ken Simpler and others
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Biggins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Truesdale v. Cacheris et al
as 3:2017cv00665
Plaintiff:
Adam I.L. Truesdale
Defendant:
James C Cacheris , Graham C Mullen , Kenneth M Smith and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
