Cases 1 - 10 of 168
Ewing v. Rogers, et al.
as 24-466
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTON A. EWING
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARLES C. ROGERS and CHUCK "BUCK" ROGERS REALITY, INC., a California corporation
McCollum v. Hayes et al
as 1:2023cv01422
Plaintiff:
Portia McCollum and Raytheon Technologies Corporation
Nominal Defendant:
RTX Corporation
Defendant:
Gregory J. Hayes, Robert K. Ortberg, Frederic G. Reynolds and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Keritsis v. Hayes et al
as 1:2023cv01351
Nominal Defendant:
RTX Corporation and Raytheon Technologies Corporation
Plaintiff:
George Keritsis
Defendant:
Gregory Hayes, Tracy A. Atkinson, Leanne G. Caret and others
McCollum v. Hayes et al
as 3:2023cv01414
Plaintiff:
Portia McCollum and Raytheon Technologies Corporation
Defendant:
Gregory J. Hayes, Robert K. Ortberg, Frederic G. Reynolds and others
Nominal Defendant:
RTX Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Ferran v. Hayes et al
as 1:2023cv01220
Nominal Defendant:
RTX Technologies Corporation and Raytheon Technologies Corporation
Plaintiff:
Jose R. Ferran, III
Defendant:
Gregory J. Hayes, Neil Mitchill, Anthony F. O'Brien and others
Rogers v. Howard et al
as 3:2023cv05806
Plaintiff:
Daryl C Rogers
Defendant:
Timothy Howard, James Jolly, Aaron Arias and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ewing v. Rogers
as 3:2023cv01379
Plaintiff:
Anton A. Ewing
Defendant:
Charles C Rogers and Chuck "Buck" Rogers Reality, Inc.
Jason C. Rogers v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv02680
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Jason C. Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Rogers v. Warden
as 3:2023cv01879
Plaintiff:
Robert C Rogers
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
