Cases 1 - 10 of 1,813
Smith v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02079
Plaintiff:
Paul C Smith
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Michael Gorbey v. Assistant Warden Crickard
as 24-6418
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY, a/k/a Michael S. Owlfeather-Gorbey, a/k/a Michael S. Feather-Gorbey
Defendant:
CRICKARD, FCI Estill S.C., COMMISSARY STAFF DUERK, FCI Estill S.C., COUNSELOR PLATTS, C-B; FCI Estill S.C. and others
Spencer v. Pulido-Esparza, et al.
as 24-2444
Plaintiff:
EDWARD B. SPENCER
Defendant:
L. PULIDO-ESPARZA, Correctional Officer at SATF, C. SMITH, Correctional Lieutenant at SATF, STUART SHERMAN, Warden at SATF and others
Smith v. Sheridan County Sheriff et al
as 2:2024cv00044
Defendant:
Sheridan County Sheriff, Sheridan Chief of Police, Sheridan County Prosecutor LaRosa and others
Plaintiff:
Franklin C Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vanessa Smith v. United Industries Ultra Board
as 24-1288
Plaintiff:
Vanessa C. Smith
Defendant:
United Industries Ultra Board
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1291
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Vanessa Smith v. John Kendricks, et al
as 24-1716
Plaintiff:
Vanessa C. Smith
Defendant:
Dr. John Kendricks, M.D., Primary Care Physician and John S. LaTour, Tax Law
Smith v. Sheridan County Sheriff
as 2:2024cv00050
Defendant:
Sheridan County Sheriff and Levi Dominguez
Petitioner:
Franklin C Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hopper v. County of Tulsa et al
as 4:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Keith-Dewane Hopper
Defendant:
County of Tulsa, Vic Regalado, S Holloway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harriott v. Annucci et al
as 1:2024cv02298
Plaintiff:
Albert Harriott
Defendant:
Anthony J. Annucci, Kathy Hochul, C. Koenigsmann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
