Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Diaz v. Geo Group, Inc et al
as 9:2023cv81331
Plaintiff: Scotty Santos Diaz
Defendant: Geo Group, Inc, H. Matos, Marie Michelle Amede and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Barnhill et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2021cv00069
Plaintiff: Malcolm Zabad Washington
Defendant: District Attorney George Barnhill, Sheriff Randy F. Royal, Sheriff Carl James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SPIVEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv43705
Plaintiff: MICHAEL C SPIVEY
Defendant: 3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Spivey v. Warden FMC Butner
as 5:2019hc02113
Petitioner: Tony C. Spivey
Respondent: Warden FMC Butner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Spivey v. Aetna Life Insurance Company
as 3:2018cv00781
Plaintiff: Joseph C. Spivey
Defendant: Aetna Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Spivey v. State of California We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv00183
Petitioner: W. C. Spivey
Respondent: State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Spivey v. State of California We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00159
Petitioner: W. C. Spivey
Respondent: State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Spivey v. McDonald We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv00206
Petitioner: W. C. Spivey
Respondent: M. McDonald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ray Spivey v. Gary Pierce
as 11-1312
Petitioner - Appellant: RAY C. SPIVEY
Respondent - Appellee: GARY PIERCE
SPIVEY et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv60075
Plaintiff: ANDERSON C. SPIVEY and BONNIE SPIVEY
Defendant: ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. , FIBREBOARD CORPORATION , FLEXITALLIC GASKET COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?