Cases 1 - 10 of 48
STOCKTON v. HARRY et al
as 1:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
RONALD STOCKTON
Defendant:
LAUREL HARRY, SUPERINTENDENT R. IRWIN, R. MARSH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Dickson v. Washabaugh et al
as 1:2023cv02054
Plaintiff:
James E. Dickson
Defendant:
J. Washabaugh, Lt. Foster, C.O. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ryles v. Logan et al (INMATE 3)
as 3:2023cv00526
Plaintiff:
Sanford Leonard Ryles
Defendant:
Reginald Logan, Heath Taylor, William Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Molina
as 23-6582
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROY TAYLOR
Defendant / Appellee:
MOLINA, NYCDOC EMPLOYEES, JOHN DOE AUBURN MEDICAL ADM & HEALTH CARE PROVIDER and others
Franklin v. Lake County Ohio et al
as 1:2023cv00108
Plaintiff:
Bryan Michael Franklin
Defendant:
Lake County Ohio, Cpt Cynthia Brooks, K. Morse and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Frazier v. Smith (INMATE 2)
as 2:2022cv00663
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Quintin Frazier
Defendant:
C.O. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Whalley, Sr. v. Blazick, et al
as 22-3036
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL J. WHALLEY, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
C.O. BLAZICK, C.O. MARVIN, C.O. SMITH and others
SNYDER v. DEMORE et al
as 2:2022cv01294
Plaintiff:
JOHN ALLEN SNYDER
Defendant:
JOSEPH DEMORE, K. LONG, C.O. SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Bennett v. Reed et al
as 3:2021cv02122
Plaintiff:
Corey Alan Bennett
Defendant:
C.O. Reed, C.O. Belson, Lt. Mccluskey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fabricio v. Lee
as 21-2964
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ederick Fabricio
Defendant / Appellee:
Sgt. Miller, C.O. J. Erns, C.O. Chase and others
Defendant:
Supt. W. Lee, Supt. T. Griffin, Dep. SS. E. Burnett and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
