Cases 1 - 10 of 31
CAGE et al v. KIPP ACADEMY CHICAGO et al
as 1:2024cv03966
Plaintiff:
BEVERLY CAGE and JOHN DOE
Defendant:
KIPP ACADEMY CHICAGO and DONNELL MCDAVID
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cage v. Williams et al
as 3:2023cv50351
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Cage
Defendant:
Tarry Williams, Dr. Larry Sy, Dr. Merrill Zahtz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cage et al v. L Oreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv08310
Plaintiff:
Sue Randle Cage and Jethro Cage
Defendant:
L Oreal USA, Inc., L Oreal USA Products, Inc., Luster Products, Inc., and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Matthews v. Bannua et al
as 1:2023cv07179
Plaintiff:
Nathan Matthews
Defendant:
Cage Bannua
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARSHALL v. CITY OF EVANSVILLE, INDIANA et al
as 3:2023cv00119
Plaintiff:
DYLAN MARSHALL
Defendant:
CITY OF EVANSVILLE, INDIANA, EVANSVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, SAM SEDORIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 21-2447
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cage v. Holloway et al
as 1:2021cv02987
Petitioner:
Quinton Cage
Respondent:
James Holloway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McNett v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2020cv00426
Plaintiff:
Daniel J. McNett
Defendant:
Lt. Gephart, C/O Orr, Sgt. Richie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Estate of Kristina Ann Fiebrin, et al v. Armor Correctional Health Serv, et al
as 19-2060
Defendant / Appellee:
MILWAUKEE COUNTY, WISCONSIN, EVA CAGE, BRITENY R. KIRK and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT MARTINEZ, ESTATE OF ANGELICA M. FIEBRINK, ESTATE OF KRISTINA ANN FIEBRINK, by Special Administrator NATHANIEL CADE, JR. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00832
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
