Cases 1 - 10 of 16
CAPITAL AREA IMMIGRANTS' RIGHTS COALITION et al v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2023cv03344
Plaintiff:
ROBERTO CARLOS RODRIGUEZ GUERRA, CAPITAL AREA IMMIGRANTS' RIGHTS COALITION and CARLOS ROBERTO RODRIGUEZ GUERRA
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and U.S. IMMIGRATION & CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Capital Area Immigrants Rights Coalition v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2023cv01498
Plaintiff:
CAPITAL AREA IMMIGRANTS RIGHTS COALITION
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
The Farmworker Association of Florida, Inc. et al v. DeSantis et al
as 1:2023cv22655
Plaintiff:
The Farmworker Association of Florida, Inc., A. M., J. L. and others
Defendant:
Ronald D. DeSantis, Ashley Moody, Nicholas B. Cox and others
Amicus Curiae:
American Immigration Lawyers Association and Capital Area Immigrants' Rights Coalition
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
AMERICAN IMMIGRATION COUNCIL et al v. EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW
as 1:2023cv01952
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN IMMIGRATION COUNCIL and CAPITAL AREA IMMIGRANTS' RIGHTS COALITION
Defendant:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2023cv01879
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN IMMIGRATION COUNCIL, Capital Area Immigrants' Rights Coalition and NO PARTY
Defendant:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Pangea Legal Services, et al v. USDHS, et al
as 20-17490
Defendant / Appellant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, Deputy Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, JAMES MCHENRY, Director of the Executive Office for Immigration Review and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CATHOLIC LEGAL IMMIGRATION NETWORK, INC., DOLORES STREET COMMUNITY SERVICES, CAPITAL AREA IMMIGRANTS' RIGHTS COALITION and others
Amicus Curiae:
IMMIGRATION REFORM LAW INSTITUTE
Pangea Legal Services et al v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 3:2020cv09253
Plaintiff:
Catholic Legal Immigration Network, Inc., Capital Area Immigrants' Rights Coalition, Dolores Street Community Services, Inc. and others
Defendant:
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Tony H. Pham, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli and others
Amicus Curiae:
Members of the Board of Immigration Appeals, Kids in Need of Defense, Immigration Law Professors and others
Petitioner:
Immigration Equality
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Pangea Legal Services et al v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 3:2020cv07721
Defendant:
Mark A Morgan, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Tony H. Pham and others
Plaintiff:
Catholic Legal Immigration Network, Inc., Capital Area Immigrants' Rights Coalition, Dolores Street Community Services and others
Petitioner:
Immigration Equality
Amicus Curiae:
Immigration Legal Services Organizations and Immigration Law Professors
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Capital Area Immigrants, et al v. Donald Trump, et al
as 20-5273
Defendant / Appellant:
Executive Office for Immigration Review, United States Customs and Border Protection, Chad F. Wolf, Acting Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, in his official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Z.B.M., Capital Area Immigrants' Rights Coalition, Refugee and Immigrant Center For Education and Legal Services, Inc. and others
Capital Area Immigrants' Rights Coalition v. United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al
as 1:2020cv00327
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, Greg L. Collett, Matthew T. Albence and others
Plaintiff:
Capital Area Immigrants' Rights Coalition
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
