Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00554
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Green v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2019cv01092
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Petitioner:
Carl Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
GREEN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv01699
Plaintiff:
CARL GREEN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Clifton v. Schofield et al
as 3:2014cv02026
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee Clifton, Charles Montague, Derrick Payne and others
Defendant:
Derrick Schofield, Jason Woodall, Tony Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montague et al v. Schofield et al
as 2:2014cv00292
Plaintiff:
Charles Montague, Derrick Payne, Christopher Hamilton and others
Defendant:
Centurion, Georgia Crowell, Bill Haslam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. No Defendants Named
as 1:2010cv01034
Plaintiff:
Clovis Carl Green, Jr.
Defendant:
No Defendants Named
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Corrections
as 1:2009cv02911
Plaintiff:
Clovis Carl Green, Jr.
Defendant:
Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Executive Director of the Colo
as 09-1414
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLOVIS CARL GREEN, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Green, Jr. v. Executive Director of the Colo
as 09-1395
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLOVIS CARL GREEN, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Green, Jr. v. Executive Director of CDOC
as 09-1394
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLOVIS CARL GREEN, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
