Cases 11 - 20 of 125
Cribbs v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2022cv01950
Plaintiff:
Charlotte Elizabeth Cribbs
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, John E. Wetzel, George Little and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caro v. Keener et al
as 4:2022cv00754
Plaintiff:
Miguel Caro
Defendant:
Jennifer Keener and John/Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BANKS v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2022cv03184
Plaintiff:
DONALD BANKS
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS d/b/A SCI SOMERSET, Deputy Superintenden MICHELLE HOUSER, Deputy Superintenden DAN CARO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PENDLETON vs. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL
as 3:2021cv00146
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J. PENDLETON
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SUPERINTENDANT ERIC W. TICE and DAN CARO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
NEWMAN v TICE et al
as 3:2021cv00105
Defendant:
RHU JOHN DOE, LT PRITZ, CAPT BOYCE and others
Plaintiff:
DARRYL B. NEWMAN, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Jose Caro v. Twin Towers Correctional Facility
as 2:2021cv03784
Defendant:
Twin Towers Correctional Facility
Plaintiff:
Jose Caro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jose Caro v. Ms. Davis
as 2:2021cv02678
Plaintiff:
Jose Caro
Defendant:
Ms. Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jose Caro v. Davis
as 2:2021cv00685
Plaintiff:
Jose Caro
Defendant:
Ms. Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SNIDER v. ALVAREZ et al
as 3:2020cv00241
Respondent:
Officer Heckert, C/O KILLEEN, Captain Eichenberg and others
Defendant:
ROBIN ALVAREZ and STEVENS
Plaintiff:
JOEL SNIDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
SCOTT v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2020cv00173
Plaintiff:
HARVEY SCOTT SCOTT and HARVEY SCOTT, JR.
Defendant:
SHAEFER, HAY, GERBER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
