Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Cobble v. All Georgia Supreme Judges et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2019cv00666
Plaintiff:
Daniel Eric Cobble and Daniel Castleberry
Defendant:
US District North Georgia, US Magistrate North Georgia, US Magistrate Chattanooga and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brickie v. Region's Bank et al
as 2:2018cv01613
Defendant:
Region's Bank, Steven Castleberry and Wayne Key
Plaintiff:
Angela Brickie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Doss v. Rooker et al
as 7:2017cv02145
Plaintiff:
Sandrew Doss
Defendant:
Rooker, Harvey, Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doss v. Lanford et al
as 7:2017cv01955
Plaintiff:
Sandrew Doss
Defendant:
Lanford, Bryant, Lovett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Castleberry v. Rahming (INMATE 1) (MEMBER)
as 2:2017cv00656
Plaintiff:
Adam Castleberry
Defendant:
Wilcotte Rahming
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Castleberry v. Rahming (INMATE 2) (LEAD)
as 2:2017cv00252
Plaintiff:
Adam Castleberry
Defendant:
Wilcott Rahming
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Kilby Correctional Facility et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2015cv00729
Plaintiff:
Ronnie V. Williams
Defendant:
Kilby Correctional Facility, Central Records Review Board, Board of Pardon and Paroles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Castleberry (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG+)
as 2:2015cv00166
Plaintiff:
Sadaka Davis
Defendant:
Egar Castleberry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Castleberry v. Colvin(CONSENT)
as 2:2013cv00411
Plaintiff:
Derek M. Castleberry
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Amason & Associates Inc v. Columbus Land Development LLC et al
as 7:2012cv02459
Plaintiff:
Amason & Associates Inc
Defendant:
Columbus Land Development LLC, Gregory Friedman, Mark Castleberry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
